The impression of film photography should never fadeoff

Photography is inherent in our lives at every stage from birth to death and in between. Even those of us who have little interest in photography have probably taken the most pictures in our wallet, and hang them on our walls or put them on the work table, and in person Some shots are taken. Since the advent of digital photography, we have been taking more photographs, and using them for a wide range of activities, especially extensive sharing of images with others. Today, photographs are so common that they can almost escape our notice.

Also read: benefits of sunflower seeds

Don't let Film Photography Die

Photography first entered the lives of the general public in 1888, when George Eastman invented and marketed his original Kodak camera. It was a very simple box that came pre-loaded with the film's 100-exposure roll. Once used, the entire camera was sent back to Kodak, where it was reloaded and returned to the customer, while the first roll of the film came under processing.

The simplicity of camera and film processing made photography accessible to millions of casual amateurs who had no professional training, technical expertise, or aesthetic ability. Eastman's marketing campaign intentionally shows women and children operating their cameras, as well as the slogan, "You press the button. Do the rest."

Snapshot photography became a national craze in just a few years, and by 1898, it was estimated that more than one and a half million roll-film cameras passed through the hands of amateur users.

Initial snapshots were created for purely personal reasons. Specific topics included important events such as weddings and other less formal family celebrations, holidays and leisure activities, and to capture prized items such as children, pets, and cars and homes. The images were reproduced as small prints, and a family member often arranged the photographs as narrative sequences in the albums.

In the early part of the twentieth century, serious amateur photographers began to promote photography as a fine art, where - unlike snapshot photography - the photographer demonstrated aesthetic sensibilities and technical expertise. This goal was successfully achieved, and photography advanced into an art form.

It didn't take long for the tide to turn (as it always has), and certainly by the 1950s, snapshot qualities were adopted by professional photographers for their honesty, energy, and effortlessness. The grainy, blurred, tilted horizons, irregular framing, and black and white all became an acceptable route to capture the moment. By the late 1990s, the snapshot had finally achieved modern folk art status.

These two broad schools of photography create a dialectic in camera design and development. For snap-shooters, the cameras remained slightly changed (technically) from the original, while serious photographers opted for more complex devices that offered more precise accuracy.

From the mid-1970s, electronics began to take hold on camera design, and it provided superior performance to casual photographers, without the need for technical knowledge. However, the biggest step-change emerged and began to dominate around the millennium: the digital camera.

Digital photography had created a big change because it neglets the costs and increases time of inherent with film cameras. It also expanded the options for viewing, editing, and sharing pictures and accordingly the range of usage in which they could be inserted. Other developments such as increased ownership of personal computers, and the growth of the Internet both supported the benefits and expansion of digital photography.

Today, camera phones are the dominant photographic device, and social media is the most important way in which our snap-shots are used. While most photography, in its early days, is largely a point and shoot capture of our daily lives, the underlying social behaviors have changed considerably.

For at least the first hundred years of photography, the family was at the center of our activities. The cameras were usually owned by families, and used for the benefit of that family. While all members may be partners in capturing a photograph, one particular person was usually the patron of the family album. The cost of photography made every shot valuable, and the duos that never made the pages of a family album are still retained.

In contrast, today individuals have cameras, and almost all have one under a certain age. Our social circle has changed: we have more casual acquaintances, and a larger pool of fragmented families. Zero cost of photography means that a higher number of shots are taken, but the ease of removal makes the durability of images more ethereal.

It is these changes that bring me to the point of this article; To overcome the concern that we are creating a historical void, where information and details about the risk of an era are lost. I personally have gaps in the pictorial record of my life that begins at a time when I too tUrned for digital photography. Of course, I can print my photos, to make them more tangible, and put them into an album, but I don't: it uses digital ethos to recreate the boundaries that contribute to the film's demise. Is not a part. Equally, the increased automation of camera technology and the reach of image manipulation reduce the need for technical expertise, and aesthetic sensitivity (at the time of exposure) that underscores photography as an art. In fact, the only significant resurgence in aesthetic film photography - lomography - is prejudice, rules and abandonment of knowledge champion.

I am not advocating that film photography should be fine art: a snap shot is as worthy as it ever was. Neither am I trying to claim that digital photography does not demand skill, nor do its images qualify as an art. My concern is that yet another skill - photography not used - will be lost in a world where we increasingly rely on technology, so that we can do our thinking with us. The situation is a bit different to say that just because we have calculators, we should forget how to do mental arithmetic. Equally, the craft of compiling a narrative photo album is at risk of harm, in favor of viewing the glitch of images on the small screen of a mobile phone, which travels with us to a world where it is constantly in harm's way. Exposure to threats and theft.

In summary, the key difference between digital and film photography is that the former often ends with a click, while the latter only begins with a clunk of a shutter. If you decide to explore or return to film photography, my advice is to take advantage of it and get it done. Film photography is a fascinating hobby, even if it is just the snapshot style. Its images are more permanent, and their chances of survival increase as the years pass. When all is said and done, photography is a process only for cold times, and capturing memories so that they can be remembered and enjoyed again throughout their lives.